Legal Opinion

Trenton Trust Co. v. Hudson Mechanical Rubber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The action is brought upon three promissory notes made by the Hudson Mechanical Rubber Company and indorsed by the appellant Edward J. Reilly. The latter testified that he never received any notice of protest of the-notes and this was uncontradicted. He claims to have been absolved from liability as indorser upon the ground that the proof shows that said notices were not sent as provided by law.

*377The Hudson Mechanical Rubber Company had an office at 50 Church street, New York city. The appellant Edward J. Reilly was its secretary and treasurer. On November 6, 1922, he resigned from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cuming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. University Press, John Wilson & Son, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Bacon v. . HannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of MandelbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marwitz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Century Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API