Legal Opinion

Chester-Pollard Amusement Co. v. Popular Games, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1929No. 8569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

In this action appellant, who was plaintiff in the lower court, brought suit in equity against the defendants, alleging ownership of certain patents by assignment, which will later be referred to, and that through its ownership of said inventions and letters patent it had made practical use of said inventions, and had expended large sums of money and devoted much time and effort to the commercial exploitation thereof, and had successfully established a large and increasing business in what is described and referred to in the bill of complaint as its “Golf Games,” which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Anakin Lock Works v. Dillon Lock WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKays Co. v. Penn Electric Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. General Bronze Corp. v. Cupples Products Corp. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. Gardiner v. Freed Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API