Legal Opinion

In re Miller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1919No. 9446PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Original Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus by James P. Miller, who alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty. The Attorney General filed a motion to quash the writ because of insufficiency of facts to warrant its issuance.

Miller was indicted by the grand jury of Boulder County on September 27, 1915, and taken into custody, but later admitted to bail. On the 6th day of the following December he was given leave to inspect the minutes of the grand *262jury and given ten days thereafter to file a motion to quash the indictment. That motion was duly interposed and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KeefeWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Arrowsmith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. United States v. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Ex parte StanleyNevada Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Schwindt v. SchwindtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  3. Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Pines v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. In Re SchechtelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API