Legal Opinion

Jackson v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiam.

The contract which the plaintiffs seek to enforce by this action was the result of an offer by the defendant North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham, and its acceptance by the plaintiff R. E. Jackson, on 17 August, 1934. This contract contains no provision that it must be complied with by the plaintiff within thirty days, as was the case with the contract dated 5 March, 1934. For this reason, the plaintiff had a reasonable time within which to perform the contract. The jury having found that there was no unreasonable delay on the part of the plaintiff in making a tender of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API