Legal Opinion

Larette v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1985No. 48923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of capital murder after a jury trial and sentenced to death. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by the Missouri Supreme Court in State v. LaRette, 648 S.W.2d 96 (Mo. banc 1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908, 104 S.Ct. 262, 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983), which contains a detailed discussion of the murder. Movant subsequently filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion and counsel was appointed. Counsel filed an amended motion in which movant alleged that his appointed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Grigsby v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Reed v. SlakanSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Anthony J. Larette v. Paul DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. LaRette v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. KoedatichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API