Legal Opinion

Ross v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1990No. CA 89-270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

This is the second appeal in this paternity case. In the first appeal, Ross v. Moore, 25 Ark. App. 325, 758 S.W.2d 423 (1988), we reversed the trial court’s finding that the decedent, Robert Ross, was the putative father of the appellee’s two children because the appellee had not proven her case by clear and convincing evidence. Although a blood test had been performed in connection with those proceedings, the results were not made part of the record.

In the second trial, the blood test report from National Paternity Laboratories, Inc., was introduced into evidence over…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Newton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Shipley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Ross v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. PumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoy v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Boyles v. ClementsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Bain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Parks v. EwansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API