Hamilton v. Link-Hellmuth, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.
Each side in this case has instituted an appeal on questions of law and each makes a single assignment of error. The parties will therefore be referred to simply as plaintiffs and as defendant. Defendant claims the trial court erred in overruling it’s .demurrer to the first cause of action contained in plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs claim error in the order of the court excepting certain properties of defendant from the operation of a permanent injunction.
The first cause of action reads:
“Plaintiffs, Marion K. Hamilton, Arthur R. Bauer, Esther F. Bauer, and Emma A. Hackett, say that they…
2Cited by6 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Callahan v. Ganneston Park Development Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Bersos v. Cape George Colony ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- First National Bank v. WilderMontgomery County Probate Court · 1966
- Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.