Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake City Water & Electrical Power Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1918No. 3081Published

Appeal from tbe District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Ron. C. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Salt Lake City and another against the Salt Lake City Water & Electrical Power Company and others. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the Utah & Salt Lake Canal Company and against the defendant the South Jordan Canal Company, the latter appeals.

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

FRICK, C. J.

Counsel for the plaintiff, Utah & Salt Lake Canal Company, have filed a petition for a rehearing. They, however, also ask that, in ease a rehearing is not granted, for the reasons hereinafter stated, the opinion as filed should, nevertheless, be modified in a certain particular. We shall first take up the matter of granting a rehearing.

The principal reason why a rehearing should be granted, stated in counsel’s own words, is: 4

“A proposition of law was stated in respondent’s brief which decides the case, and which apparently was not passed upon, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Orleans, M. & C. R. v. City of New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API