Legal Opinion

In Re Paolino

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1986No. 19-10458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The issue for consideration is whether we should grant a secured creditor’s motion for relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) in order to allow it to foreclose on several properties owned by the debtors. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant the motion for relief from the automatic stay.

The facts of this case are as follows: 1 In April, 1979, Home Unity Savings and Loan Association (“Home Unity”) loaned the debtors, Richard and Elaine Paolino (“the Paolinos”), $400,000.00, secured by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North East Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mikole Developers, Inc. (In Re Mikole Developers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Farmers & Mechanics National Bank v. Gilece (In Re Gilece)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Fairmont Foods Co. v. A. Z. J. Z., Inc. (In re A. Z. J. Z., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re PaolinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re Nashua Trust Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  3. In Re PaolinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API