State v. Bemis
Supreme Court of Vermont
Information, charging that respondent not being, licensed, advertised and held himself out to the public as a physician or surgeon, in violation of P. S. 5370, as amended by Sec. 4, No. 188, Acts of 1915. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury in the city court of the city of St. Albans, N. N. Post, Judge. Yerdict, not guilty. Exceptions by the State. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is a prosecution for a violation of Sec. 5370 of the Public Statutes, as amended by the Acts of 1915, No. 188, § 4. The section provides a penalty for various acts relating to the practice of either medicine or surgery, and, among other things, provides that a person who, not being licensed, advertises or holds himself out to the public as a physician or surgeon shall be subject to fine or imprisonment or both. This provision of the section the respondent is charged with violating.
The complaint was brought before the city court of the city of St. Albans, trial by jury was had, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houston v. Brush & CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Winn v. Village of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
- Weeks v. Town of LyndonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Lang v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Wetherby v. FosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1832
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McGuireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931