Legal Opinion

Peoria Steam Marble Works v. Linesenmeyer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Host. Chas. H. Phelps, Judge. Actioh in chancery to recover judgment on notes and an account against one of the defendants, and for a decree to subject to the judgment certain notes given to the other defendant, the wife of the maker of the notes, and to enjoin him from transferring them. There was a judgment and a decree for plaintiff. The wife appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

— I. The maker of the notes, against whom judgment was rendered, urges no objection thereto. His wife, who claims property in the notes sought to be subjected to the judgment, alone objects to the decision of the court below, on the ground that there was no proof of fraud, nor of the insolvency of the debtor, and that the evidence on other points is insufficient. The case is not in a condition for decision by this court. The abstract fails to show that we have ¿11 the evidence before us. It contains this language, and nothing more, referring to this matter: “Certificate of judge and reporter…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Second National Bank of Monmouth v. AshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Greenlee v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Wallick v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Carlton v. BrockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API