Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Pine Lake Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Charlevoix. (Ramsdell, J.) Assumpsit. -Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the ojfinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant under the common counts for the price of 100 cords of wood which he had agreed to cut and deliver on Pine lake, and load on the scows of the Pine Lake Iron Company, on cars to be furnished by the company. Plaintiff swore that he was to be paid along in money and goods, and to be paid in full when the wood was on the beach. The wood was to be cut in the lengths and of the size specified. The wood was piled by the beach in a solid body^ in 10 or 11 parallel rows. While plaintiff was cutting in the woods, one of defendant's men had seen the work, going on, and such as he…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yeiter v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API