Legal Opinion

Baumier v. Antiau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Monroe. (Howell, J., presiding.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMouse, J.

The plaintiffs bring suit in an action of trespass on the case, claiming damages for being unlawfully and with force and violence dispossessed of certain premises in the township of Berlin, Monroe county, which they were holding under a lease from defendant and his wife, who were the owners in fee of the lands.

The defendant claimed a relinquishment and surrender of the lease, and of the possession of the premises, by plaintiffs to him, before the date of the alleged grievances stated in the declaration.

The verdict of the jury in the court below gave the plaintiffs $400 damages.

Certain facts…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Realty Co. v. LigonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Baumier v. AntiauMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Detroit Pharmacal Co. v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API