Legal Opinion
Wallace v. City of Atlanta
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 4, 1946No. 15473PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is no allegation in the plaintiff’s petition that the rate of taxation in the City of Atlanta has been increased by reason of the act amending the charter of the city, nor is there any allegation that the rate of taxation will be increased by such act. The plaintiff’s petition does not show either present injury, or any action by the defendant which might result in injury to him. Nor are there any allegations showing a probable loss of public funds or property.
In Rounsaville v. Kohlheim, 68 Ga. 668 (45 Am. R. 505), it was held: “Mere…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Plumb v. ChristieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Reid v. Mayor of EatontonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Rounsaville v. KohlheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Hazleton v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- South Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Moultrie Milk Shed Inc. v. City of CairoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Barge v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- City of Nashville v. SnowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Whipkey v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.