Legal Opinion

Westbury v. Bauer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 31, 1985No. 22229PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant William Bauer appeals an order granting respondent Lee Westbury’s motion for a new trial. We affirm.

This action was brought by respondent to collect an alleged debt. Appellant pled the affirmative defenses of the Statute of Frauds and the Statute of Limitations. At the conclusion of respondent’s evidence, the trial judge granted appellant’s motion for an involuntary nonsuit based on the Statute of Limitations.

Thereafter, respondent made a timely motion for a new trial. A notice and motion were served on appellant. Without giving appellant an opportunity to be heard,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. ClarksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Dunsil v. Jones Chevrolet Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. DoolittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Brown v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LaMotte v. Punch Line of Columbia, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Potomac Leasing Co. v. Otts Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Jones v. GilstrapCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API