Legal Opinion
Workman v. Columbia Natural Resources
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 29, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-103PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
The instant diversity action is before the Court upon motion of the defendant, Columbia Natural Resources, by counsel, for summary judgment. [Record No. 18]. Fully briefed, this matter-is ripe for decision.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On February 2,1993, around midnight, the plaintiff, James Workman [Workman], while attempting to extinguish a forest fire and working as an employee of the Division of Forestry of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, was injured when his bulldozer hit a four-inch above-ground natural gas pipeline owned by the defendant, Columbia…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Miles v. Kohli & Kaliher Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- New Meadows Holding Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Buren v. Midwest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- McLane v. Northwest Natural Gas CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joe James v. Meow Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Smith v. Franklin CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002
- James v. Meow Media, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Webb v. Jessamine County Fiscal CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Brackett v. Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024