(PC) Thomas v. Ware
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PAUL THOMAS, No. 2:22-cv-00177-TLN-EFB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 WARE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Ware and Avila have filed a motion to compel further responses to 18 their request for production of documents (“RFPs”), set one (ECF No. 39), which plaintiff 19 opposes (ECF No. 45). For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted. 20 Before turning to the substance of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Davidson v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003