Legal Opinion

Brooke v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1921No. 11933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Money rule; from Milton superior court — Judge Blair. August 27, 1920.

1Per curiam

1. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.

2. An unreversed judgment of a competent court cannot be collaterally attacked except for fraud or collusion, or for some defect apparent, upon the face of the record or pleadings. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3218 and 5966; Hammock v. McBride, 6 Ga. 178; Smith v. Cuyler, 78 Ga. 654 (2) (3 S. E. 406); Williams v. Lancaster, 113 Ga. 1020 (6) (39 S. E. 471). See also, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), §§ 4629, 4630, 5965; McArthur v. Matthewson, 67 Ga. 134.

3. In a money-rule proceeding, where C claims money In the hands of the sheriff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McArthur & Griffin v. Matthewson & ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Williams v. LancasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Smith v. CuylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Hammock v. Wm. J.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1849

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API