Legal Opinion
Carney v. United States Guarantee Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 16, 1935No. [No. 85, October Term, 1934.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
In a bill of interpleader the State Roads Commission alleged that it had a total of $8,231.96 as retained percentages payable under two completed contracts of Henry L. Maas & Sons, Inc., for the construction of highway bridges over relocated tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad at Elkton, Maryland; that before those balances became due, on final estimates, the affairs of the contracting company were placed in the hands' of receivers, who claimed the funds accruing under the contracts, and that a claim to the funds has also been preferred by the United States Guarantee Company, as surety on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. A. D. Ingalls, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964