Ex Parte Arnold

It is undisputed that the prior driving while intoxicated charge alleged in the indictment as a necessary condition precedent to invoking the jurisdiction of the felony tribunal was nonexistent. See Article 42.-13, Sections 4(a), 7(a) and (b), V.A.C.C.P. Thus, the felony court lacking jurisdiction, the felony conviction is void. Ex parte *143Harrell, 542 S.W.2d 169 (Tex.Cr.App.); Ex parte McGee, 552 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Cr.App.); Ex parte Sealy, 563 S.W.2d 817 (Tex.Cr.App.); Ex parte Pribble, 548 S.W.2d 54 (Tex.Cr.App.); Article 6701/-2, V.A.C.S.; Article 6701/-1, V.A.C.S.

The judgment should be…