State v. Hamed
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
John F. Corrigan, Judge.
The defendant, Aly Hamed, appeals from his conviction for trafficking in food stamps. See R.C. 2913.46(A). In his single assignment of error, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to hold a hearing on his post-sentence motion to withdraw his plea of no contest. This contention has merit, so we reverse his conviction.
I
A grand jury indicted the defendant for trafficking in food stamps. After initially pleading not guilty to the charge, the defendant pled no contest and the trial court accepted that plea. The trial court thereupon found the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CooperriderOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BlatnikOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. NathanOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. BoshkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. McComb, 22570 (1-23-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.