Morrison v. Estate of Martin
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
This appeal involves a claim against a decedent’s estate for services alleged to have been rendered and for reimbursement for an advancement. While the issue was not raised by the parties, it has become our duty to determine whether or not a final appealable judgment has been entered in the cause. Beuttenmuller v. Vess Bottling Co. of St. Louis, Mo., 395 S.W.2d 204; Dudeck v. Ellis, Mo., 376 S.W.2d 197. We have reached the conclusion that the appeal is premature and must be dismissed.
On September 16, 1965, Bessie Morrison filed her claim against the Estate of Lulu Bell…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weir Ex Rel. Weir v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Lightfoot v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Walker v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Dudeck v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Scheid v. PinkhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Household Finance Corp. v. Seigel-Robert Plating Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- In Re Estate of ForhanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Orf v. Computer Institute, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.