Stoner v. Bennett
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
by Montgomery, J.:
Clearly there was evidence from which the jury in this case could charge the appellee-defendant with negligence on the basis that he entered this intersection after Stoner had been committed to it, and ran into the right side of the Stoner car with such force that it was propelled 75 feet from the point of impact. It was for the jury to determine which motorist entered the intersection first and thereby acquired the right of way under Section 1013 of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, as amended, 75 P.S. 1013. Pugh v. Ludwig, 409 Pa. 517, 186 A. 2d 911…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pugh v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963