Legal Opinion
Guillen v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 13, 2016No. 3D14-1540PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTHENBERG, J.. Sandor Eduardo Guillen (“the defendant”) appeals his criminal convictions on the grounds ’that the trial court abused its discretion by: (1) denying his motion for a continuance; (2) denying his motion to preclude the State from calling William Wright (“Wright”) as an expert witness; and (3) permitting the State to introduce photographs of the deceased victim’s injuries. 1 Because the defendant failed to preserve the first issue for appellate review and the trial court did not abuse its discretion on the remaining two appellate issues, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
In 2012, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Delhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- TERRY LEE BENTZ JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Gary Michael Hilton v. State of Florida & Gary Michael Hilton v. Mark S. Inch, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2021
- Roy Harold Bissember v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- State of Iowa v. Oleaf TeohCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021