Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Singer Manuf'g Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. Plaintiff brought this action to recover certain commissions which lie alleges were due him on the sale of thirty sewing-machines, such sales being made under a written contract between the parties, whereby plaintiff was to receive a commission on each sale. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Reed, J.-

On the seventh day of August, .1881, the parties executed a written contract, the material provisions of which are as follows: “ The Singer Manufacturing Company, a corporation duly organized, party of the first part, and il. W. Tuclc, party of the second part, enter into a contract as follows: (1) The party of the first part agrees to pay the party of the second part $6 per week for his services in selling and leasing Singer sewing-machines. (2) That said first party agrees to pay to second party 15 per centum on all cash that may be realized during the continuance of this agreement…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lukin v. MarvelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Mayne v. Council Bluffs Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Ashby v. NineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API