Legal Opinion

Sunflower County v. Bank of Drew

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1924No. 24171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The suit was instituted in the chancery court on behalf of Sunflower county against the Bank of Drew and the liquidating agent of the state banking department, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, *201surety on the bond of the bank as a county depository, to recover a balance of about sixteen thousand dollars due the county by the bank for funds deposited therein, after the bank closed its doors January 20', 1922. From a decree denying the relief sought this appeal is prosecuted.

The case in substance is this: The Bank of Drew qualified as county depository from January 5, 1920, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Wilkinson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McLaughlin v. GreenMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hill v. WoodwardMississippi Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City Nat. Bank v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Peoples Bank v. GoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Use Randolph County v. Pocahontas State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Love v. Sunflower CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API