Legal Opinion

Fuller v. UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1970No. 4944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge.

In an amended answer to appellee’s complaint for the balance due on a promissory note, the maker of the note alleged, inter alia, that the underlying transaction was usurious and counterclaimed for damages for breach of warranty, libel, and invasion of privacy. At the completion of the non-jury trial, the trial court found for appel-lee on both the complaint and the counterclaim without making any findings of fact or conclusions of law. 1

At trial appellee entered into evidence a conditional sales contract, dated June 29, 1967, evidencing appellant’s conditional purchase…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harold R. Olinger v. American Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Everett A. R. Searl, Pearl A. Searl v. Donald M. EarllCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Hill v. HawesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. James W. Beatty v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. Russell v. Universal Acceptance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. SchlickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Caruso v. HollanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Sloan v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API