Legal Opinion

Edinburgh Lombard Investment Co. v. Walsh

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 13,954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Per_ Curiam:

A district court has the power and jurisdiction to correct a journal entry of a judgment to make it speak the truth as to the judgment which was in fact originally rendered, even after such judgment, manifested by a certified copy of such erroneous journal entry, has been reviewed on proceedings in error in this court and such judgment has been affirmed, when it clearly appears from the whole record that, by reason of clerical mistakes, the journal entry does not express the judgment which was in fact rendered, and where it also clearly appears that the errors corrected were not…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christisen v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Cazzell v. CazzellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Marker v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. In re HornungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Victory Life Insurance v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API