Courtney v. Dunning

*243Opinion ok the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

L. W. Dunning brought this suit against G. C. Courtney and others to recover on a promissory note for $825.00, dated April 17, 1920, and payable one year after date with six per cent interest from maturity. Courtney pleaded non est factum, and a trial before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. Courtney appeals.

As the evidence was conflicting and, therefore, such as to make the question of non est factum one for the jury, a statement of the facts is unnecessary, and we shall proceed to discuss the grounds relied on for…