Mutual Oil Co. v. Empire Petroleum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
It clearly appears from the verified bill of complaint, the copy of the contract attached thereto as an exhibit, and the admissions and averments in the answer that the appellant, the Mutual Oil Company, is and was at the time this action was commenced a Michigan corporation doing business in Ohio. People’s Tobacco Co., Ltd. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U. S. 79, 38 S. Ct. 233, 62 L. Ed. 587, Ann. Cas. 1918C, 537; Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbin, 243 U. S. 265, 37 S. Ct. 280, 61 L. Ed. 710. It further appears from the record that it was legally served with summons in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughan v. John C. Winston Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- NLRB v. Starbucks Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025