PetroQuest Energy, LLC v. Banks
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
_JjThis concursus proceeding questions the appropriate royalty to be paid a mineral lessor from a well operated by the plaintiff in the concursus. Both the lessor and an overriding royalty interest owner were named as defendants. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment seeking a determination of the appropriate royalty due from the well in light of an amendment to the original lease. The trial court entered partial summary judgment in favor of the overriding royalty interest *545holder. The lessor appeals. For the following reasons, we reverse the entry of partial summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Holt Oil & Gas Corporation and Faywin Investments, Pty. Ltd., Plaintiffs-Counter v. Ralph L. Harvey, Defendant-CounterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Jackson v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jerry Dregin & Gretchen Dregin v. Robert Lincoln Desoto &Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021