Eiseman v. Daugherty
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
In this proceeding for review petitioner seeks to annul an order made by respondent and revoking petitioner’s license as a broker, granted to him under the terms of the Corporate Securities Act, so called. The writ of review issued and respondent has made due return thereto.
The license was for the calendar year 1922. The Corporate Securities Act contains a section to the effect that every certificate licensing a broker “shall expire on the thirty-first day of December next after its issuance, unless sooner revoked” (Stats. 1917, p. 677, see. 5; Deering’s Consol. Supp. Gen. Laws, 1917-21, p.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manoogian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People ex rel. Pechtold v. BogartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Visalia City Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898