Legal Opinion

Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. Pierz Co-Operative Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1927No. 25,629PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Consolidated actions for the foreclosure of two mechanic’s liens. Defendant, the owner of the property sought to be charged, appeals from the judgment.

Defendant owns and operates a creamery at Pierz, in Morrison county. The materials, for the price of which the liens are claimed, went into a new creamery building which it erected in the autumn of 1922 and the winter of 1922-1923 upon what counsel designate for convenience as the “new site.” Its old building was on the “old site,” some 260 feet due east from the new. The old site is an irregular tract of 52 square rods located just outside and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co. v. Norwegian-Danish Evangelical Lutheran Augsburg SeminarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Atlas Lumber Co. v. DupuisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Evans v. SanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Tulloch v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Bassett v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jandrich v. SvabekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Banco Mortgage Co. v. E. G. Miller Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API