Jacobson v. Allen
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, C. J.
Without passing upon subordinate questions raised by the demurrer, the bill must be held bad because the right of action sought to be enforced does not exist in favor of the complainant. The defendants are sued as stockholders of the bank of Chicago, an insolvent corporation of the state of Illinois, and the bill seeks to charge them with a liability imposed by one of the sections of the incorporating act, which provides that “each stockholder shall be liable to double the amount of stock held or owned by him, and for three months after giving notice of transfer.” The bill alleges that in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Briggs v. PennimanCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
- Terry v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Wincock v. TurpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Ochiltree v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cushing v. PerotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Cecil B. De Mille Productions, Inc. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Wallace v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ford v. SaulsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Brown v. TrailU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.