Legal Opinion
Grigsby v. Esper
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2018-0792Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SCOTT D. GRIGSBY, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-792 (JMC) v. DANIEL P. DRISCOLL, Secretary of the Army, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Scott Grigsby challenges a decision by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), in which the ABCMR rejected Grigsby’s request to remove a non-punitive letter of reprimand from his permanent military personnel file. Grigsby was reprimanded by U.S. Army Reserve Brigadier General William Gothard for conduct that occurred while Grigsby was on active duty but that was only discovered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.