Cortez v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for theft by check of services of a value of over $200 (V.T.C.A., Penal Code Secs. 31.04, 31.-06). Punishment was assessed at two years.

The conviction in this ease must be set aside because the evidence is insufficient to support the allegations in the indictment. The state alleged that appellant:. . with intent to avoid payment for the tinting of plate glass windows with Sun-X Film No. F-88 Gold, a service that he knew was provided by Bill Grounder only for compensation, did intentionally and knowingly by deception secure performance of…