Legal Opinion

Borden Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1952No. Appeal, 3PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Nathan L. Traub and Katharine M. Buchsbaum, here referred to as intervenors, are the owners of a tract of ground containing 13 acres in Cheltenham Township in Montgomery County. Desiring to build two apartment houses on this ground, they applied to the township authorities for the necessary permission. As the land was in a “B” residence district, it was necessary for them to appear before the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Cheltenham Township to establish that the contemplated building project could be authorized (under the zoning ordinance in effect) as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jennings' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kerr's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Triolo v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Reininger Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Berman Et Ux. v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Montgomery County v. Merlands Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Silverco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Ferry v. KownackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API