Legal Opinion

State v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1974No. 7312SC765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The evidence of defendant’s guilt was cogent. Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant.

Defendant first argues that “the State failed to introduce into evidence the affidavit to obtain the search warrant” and that this constitutes error. The record discloses that the trial judge examined the affidavit and warrant and determined the validity of the warrant as a matter of law. The affidavit and warrant were made a part of the record. This was the proper procedure. Our court has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SpillarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. MiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API