J.L.W. v. State

J.L.W., the respondent below, appeals from an order of adjudication of delinquency and an order placing him on community control. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the respondent’s cross examination of a co-respondent who testified for the state. The respondent sought to show that the witness received favorable treatment from the state because only the respondent, and none of the other four boys who were arrested with him, was charged with burglary. Any error was harmless as a police officer already had testified that respondent was the only one of four boys…