Miller v. Upper Allen Township Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
In a zoning case, where a person objecting to development permission does not reside or have a property interest in land within the municipality whose zoning ordinance is involved, does the intervening municipal boundary in itself negate the objectors standing, as a party aggrieved, to appeal a zoning hearing board decision to court or, as an aggrieved person, to intervene in a zoning appeal filed in the court?
Is the answer to this question the same if the would-be objector is another municipality?
The record common to both of these cases poses the stated issues so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Cablevision—Division of Sammons Communications, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Atlee EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lantz v. Zoning Hearing Board of South Middleton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by15 opinions
- ACS Enterprises, Inc. v. Norristown Borough Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Sunnyside Up Corp. v. City of Lancaster Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Laughman v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF NEWBERRY TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Appeal of HooverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Broad Mountain Development Co., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.