Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kaufman Advertising Agency v. Snellenburgh

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1904Published

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in the City Court of the city of New York, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

1Concurrence

Giegbeich, J. (concurring).

The action is to recover upon a quantum meruit for services rendered under an agreement alleged in the complaint to have been made on or about April 3, 1901, between the plaintiff, a domestic corporation, and the defendants, copartners, engaged in business under the firm name or style of E. Snellenburgh & Co., by which the former agreed to prepare and to procure to be inserted in various daily newspapers published in the city of Eew York, notices or so called “ write ups ” to the effect that the defendants were about to open an establishment in the borough of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Clark v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Ketchum v. Van DusenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Purdy v. Nova Scotia Midland Ry. & I. Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Cunningham v. DoyleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API