Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. Graham
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bell:
The decision of this Court awarding custody of a child four and one-half years old to a great-grandfather, aged 78, instead of to his mother, is, according to all human experience, directly contrary to the best interests and welfare of a young child. A fortiori is this so when the great-grandfather subsists on old age assistance and the child and he share a bedroom in a three-room house where there is no water, no lights, and no bathroom; and no woman to help care for him.
It is well and wisely settled both in Pennsylvania and in Ohio that the pole star is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Children's Aid Society v. GardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Teitelbaum v. TeitelbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.