Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. Graham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1951No. Appeal, 95Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bell:

The decision of this Court awarding custody of a child four and one-half years old to a great-grandfather, aged 78, instead of to his mother, is, according to all human experience, directly contrary to the best interests and welfare of a young child. A fortiori is this so when the great-grandfather subsists on old age assistance and the child and he share a bedroom in a three-room house where there is no water, no lights, and no bathroom; and no woman to help care for him.

It is well and wisely settled both in Pennsylvania and in Ohio that the pole star is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Children's Aid Society v. GardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Teitelbaum v. TeitelbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API