Legal Opinion

Voss v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 2001No. 99-1448PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The issue is this case is whether Iowa Code section 321J.8 (1999)1 requires that the implied consent advisory be reread before the administration of each chemical test when multiple tests are requested. The appellant, Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), ruled that the advisory need not be given a second time when an, additional test is administered. The district court’s reversal of the agency’s decision was affirmed on appeal by the Iowa Court of Appeals. This court granted further review. Upon our examination of the record and consideration of the arguments of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Horsman v. WahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Hansen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Scott v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. State v. FortmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Casey Mcgill Ginger L. Mcgill Ashlea D. Mcgill And Casey Mcgill, As Parent And Next Best Friend Of Amanda R. Mcgill, Alicia C. Mcgill, And Allison C. Mcgill, Minors Vs. Ben Fish, Thomas Vine, Mark Newton, Robert Selby, And Steven ShafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. IBP, Inc. v. HarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. State v. BullockSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API