Legal Opinion

Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 11, 2012No. 03 MDL 1570(GBD)(FM); Nos. 02-CV-6977 (GBD)(FM), 03-CV-9849 (GBD)(FM), 04-CV-5970 (GBD)(FM), 04-CV-7279 (GBD)(FM), 03-CV-6978 (GBD)(FM), 04-CV-7280 (GBD)(FM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge:

In this multi-district litigation, Plaintiffs seek to hold multiple defendants who al*779legedly aided, abetted, sponsored, conspired to sponsor, financed, or otherwise provided material support to Osama Bin Laden and the terrorist organization al Qaeda, liable for the physical destruction, death, and injuries suffered as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (“September 11th Attacks”).1 Plaintiffs allege that moving defendant Saudi Binladin Group (“SBG”) provided material support and financing to Osama Bin Laden,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Terrorist Attacks On Sept. 11, 2001 v. Al Rajhi BankDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API