Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Government Employees Insurance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 2000No. 98-CV-650PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Vanessa Fisher was injured in an automobile accident while insured by Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”) under an automobile insurance policy which included personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits. She sued GEI-CO for breach of contract, alleging that GEICO was hable to her under the policy for a particular medical expense associated with the accident even though her health insurance plan, an employee welfare benefit plan regulated under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1994), had already paid…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Board of Directors v. Board of TrusteesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lawrence A. Hubb v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mighty Earth v. Jbs USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.