Legal Opinion

Van Pelt v. Schauble

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Oil error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The plaintiff and Jive other persons, acting separately, deposited with a Jinn in Newark, of which the defendants were members, various sums of money for the purpose *639of -winning or losing as the price of certain stocks should rise or fall. Afterwards the other persons assigned to the plaintiff their right to the moneys so deposited, and he brought this suit to recover the same. His declaration set forth only the common money counts. At the trial it appeared that the defendants had paid the money to other parties, presumably on a fall in the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. ZobyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Auditorium Kennel Club v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  3. Dayton v. BoettnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Johnson v. AndersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BeneventoBergen County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API