Legal Opinion

People v. Bohlen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1992No. B044076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, Acting P. J.

Defendant Dawn Kay Bohlen appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) entered upon her plea of no contest to charges that she drove a motor vehicle when she was so under the influence that her blood-alcohol content exceeded 0.20 percent and while so doing she committed an unlawful act that resulted in injury to another. (Veh. Code, § 23153, subds. (a) and (b), § 23206.1.) She contends:

“Penal Code section 1387 barred prosecution of appellant in information A042185 after the People suffered two dismissals in prosecutions 88L05329 and A041266.”

We frequently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. People v. CossioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. EliasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Martinez)California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Berardi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. United States v. Paul Edward RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API