Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1947No. A-10497PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

The record in this case discloses, beyond doubt, that the defendant, George Smith, a negro, made an unprovoked attack on H. O. Crane, a white man, with premeditated design to injure Crane. The facts, however, are not involved in the appeal. For those who may be interested in the facts, see Smith v. State, 81 Okla. Cr. 412, 165 P. 2d 381, wherein Judge Barefoot gives a full and complete statement of the facts.

The only question herein involved is one of law, as set forth in assignment of error No. 2, “that'the verdict of the jury is contrary to law.” This error was based upon the verdict which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Dunbar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Bowlegs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Ex Parte HightowerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. State v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API