Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fitch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 2, 1910No. 492Published

The opinion states the case.

1Dissent

When the original opinion was handed down I disagreed for two reasons, first, because of the insufficiency of the indictment, and, second, because the Act of the Thirty-first Legislature under which the prosecution was brought was not and can not be effective in local option territory then existing, nor can it be made operative in that territory until the vote of the people of such territory have declared their will in favor of the local option law subsequent to the passage of the law under discussion. In other words, that the Act of the Legislature under discussion can not become operative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. Drechsel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API