Claude B. Morgan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
Summoning as we must our most perceptive antennae to detect prejudicial communications with a juror, we nevertheless affirm the trial court’s findings that the jury was not compromised.
The appellant, Claude B. Morgan, appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion for new trial based on an alleged prejudicial communication between a stranger to the proceedings and a juror. Morgan was tried by a jury and found guilty under an indictment charging him with violations of 18 U.S. C. Sec. 1341. The substance of the charge was that Morgan used the mail to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Jessie Kenneth McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.